Criminal Law · MBE-tested
THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. WILLIAM ARTHUR DAYTON, Appellant
62 Ariz. 260156 P.2d 724·Arizona Supreme Court·1945·AZ
STANFOED, C. J., and LaPEADE and MOEGAN, JJ., concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Criminal No. 952.
Filed March. 14, 1945.]
[156 Pac. (2d) 724.]
THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. WILLIAM ARTHUR DAYTON, Appellant.
Mr. John L. Sullivan, Attorney General, and Mr. Harry 0. Juliani, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.
No appearance for Appellant.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, William Arthur Dayton, appealed from a conviction of sodomy. The record and transcript of minute entries and testimony taken at the trial were filed in this court. No briefs were filed nor other proceedings taken on behalf of appellant.
We have examined the information and proceedings in the lower court. The information properly states the offense of which appellant was convicted. The transcript of the testimony discloses that the evidence was sufficient to authorize the jury to find a verdict of guilty. The instructions of the court correctly state the law applicable to the facts and to the charge. We find no reversible error.
The judgment is affirmed.
STANFOED, C. J., and LaPEADE and MOEGAN, JJ., concur.