General
Law Motor Freight, Inc., et al. v. Civil Aeronautics Board et al.
387 U.S. 905·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 989.
Law Motor Freight, Inc., et al. v. Civil Aeronautics Board et al.
Bryce Rea, Jr., and Thomas M. Knebel for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Joseph B. Goldman, O. D. Ozment, Warren L. Sharfman and Robert L. Toomey for Civil Aeronautics Board, and George C. Neal and Brian C. Elmer for Emery Air Freight Corp., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.