Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wong Sun et al. v. United States, 1962 — 370 U.S. 908 · caselaw · US
General
Wong Sun et al. v. United States
370 U.S. 908·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 479.
Wong Sun et al. v. United States.
Argued March 29 and April 2, 1962.
Edward Bennett Williams (appointed by this Court, 368 U. S. 973) argued the cause and filed a supplemental brief for petitioners. Sol A. Abrams also filed a brief for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg, J. F. Bishop and Julia P. Cooper.
[MAJORITY]
Cer-tiorari, 368 U. S. 817, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
This case is restored to the calendar for reargument.