Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WATER, LIGHT & GAS COMPANY v. CITY OF HUTCHINSON, KANSAS, 1908 — 212 U.S. 555 · caselaw · US
General
WATER, LIGHT & GAS COMPANY v. CITY OF HUTCHINSON, KANSAS
212 U.S. 555·Supreme Court of the United States·1908
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WATER, LIGHT & GAS COMPANY v. CITY OF HUTCHINSON, KANSAS.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS.
No. 21.
Argued November 13, 1908.
Decided November 16, 1908.
Water, Light & Gas Co. v. Hutchinson, 207 U. S. 385, in which it was held that an exclusive franchise cannot, under the statutes of Kansas, be granted by ordinance by a city of the second class, followed.
Mr. Howard S. Lewis, Mr. H. Whiteside, Mr. John F. Dillon, Mr. Harry Hubbard and Mr. Frank Dosier for appellant.
Mr. Max Pam and Mr. A. C. Mallory for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Affirmed with costs, on authority of Water, Light & Gas Co. of Hutchinson v. The City of Hutchinson, 207 U. S. 385.