Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Johnny MARTIN v. CITY OF SEARCY
322 Ark. 562909 S.W.2d 652·Arkansas Supreme Court·1995·AR
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Johnny MARTIN v. CITY OF SEARCY
CR 95-1143
909 S.W.2d 652
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered November 20, 1995
Robert Meurer, for appellant.
No response.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Appellant Johnny Martin, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.
His attorney, Robert Meurer, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.
We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.