Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ladd et al. v. Brickley, Trustee, et al., 1947 — 330 U.S. 819 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Ladd et al. v. Brickley, Trustee, et al.
330 U.S. 819·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 825.
Ladd et al. v. Brickley, Trustee, et al.
February 10, 1947.
Howell Van Auken for petitioners. Acting Solicitor General Washington, Roger S. Foster, Robert S. Rubin and Alexander Cohen for the Securities & Exchange Commission; Bartholomew A. Brickley, Samuel Hoar and Frank B. Wallis for Brickley, Trustee; Archibald Palmer for Howard; John L. Hall and John W. Davis for the International Paper Co., and Joseph Nemerov for Kresberg et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied. Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.