Criminal Law · MBE-tested

Wake WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas

329 Ark. 503949 S.W.2d 894·Arkansas Supreme Court·1997·AR

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Wake WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas CR 97-952 949 S.W.2d 894 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered September 11, 1997 George J. Stone, for appellant. No response. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. Appellant, Wake Williams, by his attorney, George J. Stone, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to an error on his part. We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam order dated February 5, 1979. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.