Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Holt et al. v. Kirby et al., 1966 — 383 U.S. 902 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Holt et al. v. Kirby et al.
383 U.S. 902·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 132.
Holt et al. v. Kirby et al.
Simon V. Haberman on the motions. Walter R. Mansfield and John J. McCann for respondents Kirby et al., in opposition to the motions.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. (Certiorari granted, 381 U. S. 933.) Motion of Randolph Phillips for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Motion of Randolph Phillips for leave to participate in oral argument, as amicus curiae, denied.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.