Administrative
Ross Products, Inc., et al. v. United States
46 Cust. Ct. 361·United States Customs Court·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 65234.
Ross Products, Inc., et al. v. United States,
protests 59/10987, etc. (New York).
[MAJORITY — Oliver, C. J.]
Opinion by
Oliver, C. J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “M” consist of dish mops similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64603, the claim at 20 percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 923, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877), by similitude, for manufactures of cotton was sustained. Other items marked “S,” stipulated to consist of sponges the same as those involved in Abstract 61191, were held dutiable at 12% percent under the provision in paragraph 1537(b), as modified, supra, for manufactures in chief value of india rubber, by similitude, as claimed.