General
Paul Daeche, Appellant, v. Albert Bollschweiler, United States Marshal, etc.
241 U.S. 641·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 794.
Paul Daeche, Appellant, v. Albert Bollschweiler, United States Marshal, etc.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted January 31, 1916.
Decided February 21, 1916.
Mr. Merritt Lane, Mr. John W. Ockford and Mr. Otto F. Seggel for the appellant. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Fay v. Crozer, 217 U. S. 455; Hannis Distilling Co. v. Baltimore, 216 U. S. 285, 288; Hendricks v. United States, 223 U. S. 178, 184; (2) Benson v. Henkel, 198 U. S. 1, 10-11; Pierce v. Creecy, 210 U. S. 387, 401-402; (3) Glasgow v. Moyer, 225 U. S. 420; Johnson v. Hoy, 227 U. S. 245; Henry v. Henkel, 235 U. S. 219.