General
SHORT et al. v. NESS PRODUCE CO.
385 U.S. 537·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SHORT et al. v. NESS PRODUCE CO.
No. 779.
Decided January 16, 1967.
Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Harold E. Burke and Don Parker, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.
J. Bradley Colburn and Theodore B. Jensen for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.