Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James Day, Appellant, v. The Sun Insurance Office, Respondent, 1901 — 167 N.Y. 543 · caselaw · US
General
James Day, Appellant, v. The Sun Insurance Office, Respondent
167 N.Y. 543·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Day, Appellant, v. The Sun Insurance Office, Respondent.
(Argued April 25, 1901;
decided May 10, 1901.)
Day v. Sun Insurance Office, 40 App. Div. 305, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 18, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term,.
L. L. Van Allen and James Day for appellant.
Allan McCulloh for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Landon and Cullen, JJ.