General
In the Matter of the Claim of Hattie Edmunds Napper, Respondent, against Louis Eichenhofer and Another, Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent
244 A.D. 849·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1935·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of Hattie Edmunds Napper, Respondent, against Louis Eichenhofer and Another, Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
It is conceded that the deceased and Hattie Edmunds were married January 23, 1921, and they lived very happily together until June, 1923, at which time the deceased went north where he could receive higher wages. He wrote letters to his wife after going north, acknowledging the paternity of child of which his wife was then pregnant. The sole question is the paternity of Eddie Brown Napper# for whose benefit an award was made. Award unanimously affirmed,- with edsts td the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill# P. J.# Rhodes,MeNaméé, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.