Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Schmoll, Successor Assignee, et al. v. United States, 1946 — 329 U.S. 724 · caselaw · US
General
Schmoll, Successor Assignee, et al. v. United States
329 U.S. 724·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 244.
Schmoll, Successor Assignee, et al. v. United States.
October 14, 1946.
Bernard J. Gallagher and M. Walton Hendry for petitioners. Solicitor General McGrath, Assistant Attorney General Son-nett, Paul A. Sweeney and Joseph B. Goldman for the United States. Alexander M. Heron filed a brief for the Association of Casualty and Surety Executives, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Claims denied.