Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Crichton et al., doing business as Super Service Motor Freight Co., et al. v. United States et al., 1945 — 323 U.S. 684 · caselaw · US
General
Crichton et al., doing business as Super Service Motor Freight Co., et al. v. United States et al.
323 U.S. 684·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 732.
Crichton et al., doing business as Super Service Motor Freight Co., et al. v. United States et al.
January 29, 1945.
Messrs. William A. Roberts, Edgar Turlington, James E. Wilson, and Mrs. Irene Kennedy for appellants.
Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States et al., and Mr. Mortimer Allen Sullivan for Associated Transport, Inc. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted, and the judgment is affirmed. (1) North Coast Transportation Co. v. United States, ante, p. 668; Carolina Scenic Coach Lines v. United States, ante, p. 678; (2) Alton R. Co. v. United States, 315 U. S. 15, 24; and (3) United States v. Pan American Petroleum Corp., 304 U. S. 156, 158.