General
In the Matter of the Application of The People of the State of New York on the Relation of Arthur L. Lewis, Respondent, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as Comptroller of The City of New York, The Board of Estimate of The City of New York, and Joseph D. McGoldrick, Fiorello H. LaGuardia, Newbold Morris, Raymond V. Ingersoll, George U. Harvey, Stanley M. Isaacs, James H. Lyons and Joseph A. Palma, as Members of Said Board, and Kenneth Dayton, as Budget Director, and Almerindo Portfolio, as City Treasurer of The City of New York, Appellants
255 A.D. 1008·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1938·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of The People of the State of New York on the Relation of Arthur L. Lewis, Respondent, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as Comptroller of The City of New York, The Board of Estimate of The City of New York, and Joseph D. McGoldrick, Fiorello H. LaGuardia, Newbold Morris, Raymond V. Ingersoll, George U. Harvey, Stanley M. Isaacs, James H. Lyons and Joseph A. Palma, as Members of Said Board, and Kenneth Dayton, as Budget Director, and Almerindo Portfolio, as City Treasurer of The City of New York, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Final order granting petitioner’s application of [for] an order under the provisions of article 78, Civil Practice Act, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.