General

Edward Da ROZA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

48 F.2d 1027·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1931

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Edward Da ROZA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 6309. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 6, 1931. Rehearing Denied May 11, 1931. Ernest Spagnoli, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant. Geo. J. Hatfield, U. S. Atty., and A. E. Bagshaw, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal. Before RUDKIN, WILBUR, and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges. [MAJORITY — SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.] SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge. In this case, as in that of Edward Da Roza v. United States (No. 6310, C. C. A.) 48 ,F.(2d) 1025, this day decided, the defendant pleaded guilty to an indictment charging the manufacture of intoxicating liquor in violation of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA). He was sentenced to imprisonment, the period of imprisonment to run concurrently with the period of imprisonment imposed in said case, No. 6310. All of the errors assigned in this case have been considered and disposed of in case No. 6310, and the judgment is the same. Judgment affirmed.