Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joyce versus Sims, 1795 — 2 U.S. 223 · caselaw · US
General
Joyce versus Sims
2 U.S. 2232 Dall. 223·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1795·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joyce versus Sims.
THE defendant advertised a ship for freight to Madeira. The plaintiff shipped flour on board; after which, and before the ship failed, a third person attached her for a debt due to him from Pintard, the owner of the vessel, for whom the defendant acted as agent. The voyage was, by this means, broken up, and the plaintiff’s flour, being relanded, was sold to a loss.
Heatly for the plaintiff.
Wilcocks and Rawle for the defendant.
[MAJORITY]
It was ruled, by the Court, that the defendant (the agent) was not answerable for the damages sustained by the plaintiff.