Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Howard M. WERNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hugo BUA et al., Third-Party Defendants, 1975 — 512 F.2d 1381 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Howard M. WERNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hugo BUA et al., Third-Party Defendants
512 F.2d 1381·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1975
Before FRIENDLY and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges, and BARTELS, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Howard M. WERNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hugo BUA et al., Third-Party Defendants.
No. 731, Docket 74-2166.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued March 3, 1975.
Decided April 11, 1975.
Louis Noah Forman, New York City (Joseph Neiman, Newington, Conn., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.
Jeffrey S. Blum, Washington, D. C. (Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gilbert E. Andrews, Michael L. Paup and Jeffrey S. Blum, Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief, Peter C. Dorsey, U. S. Atty. for the District of Connecticut, and Henry S. Cohn, Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel), for defendant and third-party plaintiff-appellee.
Before FRIENDLY and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges, and BARTELS, District Judge.
Of the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
PER CURIAM:
Howard M. Werner appeals from a judgment of the District Court for the District of Connecticut holding him responsible as a person in ultimate control of the corporation under 26 U.S.C. § 6672 for taxes withheld from the wages of employees of Hugo’s Continental Restaurant, Inc. for the third and fourth quarters in 1967. We affirm on the basis of the opinion below, reported at 374 F.Supp. 558 (D.Conn., 1974), and upon the additional authority of Adams v. United States, 504 F.2d 73 (7th Cir., 1974); Mueller v. Nixon, 470 F.2d 1348 (6th Cir., 1972), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 949, 93 S.Ct. 3011, 37 L.Ed.2d 1001 (1973); Pacific National Insurance Co. v. United States, 422 F.2d 26 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 937, 90 S.Ct. 1838, 26 L.Ed.2d 269 (1970).