General
HOCKSTACKER et al. v. LEVY et al.
11 Cal. 76·Supreme Court of California·1858·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HOCKSTACKER et al. v. LEVY et al.
Uhlfelder et al v. Levy et al. (9 Cal. 607) affirmed.
Appeal from the District Court of the Tenth Judicial District, County of Yuba.
Messick & Swesey for Appellants.
Reardon, Smith & Mitchell for Respondents.
[MAJORITY — Burnett, J., at the April Term, 1858, delivered the opinion of the Court]
Burnett, J., at the April Term, 1858, delivered the opinion of the Court
Terry C. J;, concurring.
The facts of this case are similar to those of the case of Uhlfelder and others v. Levy and others, and the same disposition must be made of it.
Judgment affirmed.