General
BOTTS et al. v. MARX et al.
288 F. 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1923
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BOTTS et al. v. MARX et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
February 7, 1923.)
No. 6276.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.
John B. Abbott, T. T. Fauntleroy, P. H. Cullen, and John B. Edwards, all of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs in error. Moses N. Sale and David Goldsmith, both of St. Louis, Mo., for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Writ of error docketed and dismissed, with costs, on motion of defendant in error, under rule 16 (188 Fed. xi, 109 C. C. A. xi).