Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John J. Carle, as Executor of John J. Carle, Jr., Plaintiff, v. George B. Starrett et al., Defendants. Robert W. Carle et al., Respondents; George B. Starrett, as Executor of George Starrett, Deceased, and as Committee of Frederick W. Starrett, Appellant, 1905 — 181 N.Y. 552 · caselaw · US
General
John J. Carle, as Executor of John J. Carle, Jr., Plaintiff, v. George B. Starrett et al., Defendants. Robert W. Carle et al., Respondents; George B. Starrett, as Executor of George Starrett, Deceased, and as Committee of Frederick W. Starrett, Appellant
181 N.Y. 552·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John J. Carle, as Executor of John J. Carle, Jr., Plaintiff, v. George B. Starrett et al., Defendants. Robert W. Carle et al., Respondents; George B. Starrett, as Executor of George Starrett, Deceased, and as Committee of Frederick W. Starrett, Appellant.
Carle v. Starrett, 97 App. Div. 639, affirmed.
(Argued April 11, 1905;
decided April 25, 1905.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 29, 1904, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee in surplus money proceedings and directing distribution of the fund.
Jacob R. Shipherd, Dela/no C. Galvin and Charles A. W&ndall for appellant.
AdcUson Gardner, Jamies A. Speer, William B. Ewing ^ Harold Swañn, John G. Boston and William H. WUlits for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ. Absent: Gray, J.