Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Opening of Nineteenth Street by the City of Niagara Falls, Appellant, Across the Tracks and Right of Way of The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company et al., Respondents, 1902 — 170 N.Y. 576 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
In the Matter of the Opening of Nineteenth Street by the City of Niagara Falls, Appellant, Across the Tracks and Right of Way of The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company et al., Respondents
170 N.Y. 576·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Opening of Nineteenth Street by the City of Niagara Falls, Appellant, Across the Tracks and Right of Way of The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company et al., Respondents.
Matter of Opening Nineteenth St., Niagara Falls, 66 App. Div. 618, affirmed.
(Argued February 10, 1902;
decided February 25, 1902.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 20, 1901, which reversed, vacated and set aside a decision of the common council of the city of Niagara Falls to open an extension of Nineteenth street in said city across the tracks and right of way of the respondents herein.
FrcmMim J. Macl&enna for appellant.
Maurice O. Spratt and William L. Marcy for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, no question of law being presented for the consideration of this court; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: Bartlett, J. Not sitting : Gray, J.