General
Illinois v. Commonwealth Edison Co. et al.
375 U.S. 834·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 237.
Illinois v. Commonwealth Edison Co. et al.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Lee A. Freeman, Special Assistant Attorney General, and Philip B. Kurland for petitioner. Charles A. Bane and Sharon L. King for Commonwealth Edison Co. et al., and Earl E. Pollock, W. Donald McSweeney, Edward R. Adams, Harold T. Halfpenny, Lloyd M. McBride, Hammond E. Chaffetz, John Paul Stevens, Edward R. Johnston, Holmes Baldridge, Sydney G. Craig, Charles M. Price, Robert C. Keck, Owen Rail, John T. Chadwell, Richard M. Keck and Jean Engstrom for Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. et al, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.