General
George GILBERT v. STATE
23 Ala. App. 629121 So. 922·Alabama Court of Appeals·1929·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(121 So. 922)
George GILBERT v. STATE.
(7 Div. 511.)
Court of Appeals of Alabama.
March 19, 1929.
Chas. J. Scott and J. A. Johnson, both of Fort Payne, for appellant.
Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., and J. W. Brassell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
[MAJORITY — RICE, J.]
RICE, J.
This entire record, including the whole evidence in the case, has been examined and read by the court, sitting en bane. We are clear to the conclusion that appellant’s motion for a new trial should have been granted, oh the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict, and, for the error, in overruling it, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.