General
DAVID ARMITAGE & SON, Limited, v. HANIFEN
121 F. 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DAVID ARMITAGE & SON, Limited, v. HANIFEN.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
April 2, 1903.)
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
A. B. Stoughton, for appellant.
W. P. Preble, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This cause being called in its regular order, on the transcript of record from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and on motion of Joseph C. Fraley, of counsel for appellee, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the appeal in this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed at the costs of appellant.