General
MARTIN MANION & CO. v. CHATTANOOGA FOUNDRY & PIPE WORKS
170 F. 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1909
Before LURTON and SBVERENS, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MARTIN MANION & CO. v. CHATTANOOGA FOUNDRY & PIPE WORKS.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 24, 1909.)
No. 1,919.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Tennessee.
D. M. Kirton, for plaintiff in error.
Frank Spurlock, for defendant in error.
Before LURTON and SBVERENS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss the writ of error, because not brought within six months after the final judgment, is sustained, upon the authority of Kentucky, etc., Co. v. Howes, 82 C. C. A. 837, 153 Fed. 163.