Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Federal Trade Commission v. National Lead Co. et al., 1956 — 351 U.S. 961 · caselaw · US
General
Federal Trade Commission v. National Lead Co. et al.
351 U.S. 961·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 858.
Federal Trade Commission v. National Lead Co. et al.
Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Charles H. Weston, Earl W. Kintner and Robert B. Dawkins for petitioner. John B. Henrich, Jr. for the National Lead Co., Robert A. Sturges for the Sherwin-Williams Co., Richard Serviss for the Eagle-Picher Co. et al., respondents; and Thomas J. McDowell and Nathan S. Blumberg were of counsel.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted.