General
GEYER v. UNITED STATES
253 F. 988·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GEYER v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
October 7, 1918.)
No. 3216.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Southern. District of California.
James H. Ryckman, of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff in error. Robert O’Connor, U. S. Atty., and Gordon Lawson, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Motion of defendant to dismiss writ of error for noncompliance by plaintiff in error with provisions of rule 16 of this court (208 Fed. ix, 124 C. C. A. ix) granted, and writ of error dismissed.