Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Luster v. Cooksey, 1970 — 400 U.S. 854 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Luster v. Cooksey
400 U.S. 854·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant petition for certiorari, vacate judgment below, and remand for reconsideration in light of Mulloy v. United States, 398 U. S. 410.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 5211.
Luster v. Cooksey.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir.' Cer-tiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant petition for certiorari, vacate judgment below, and remand for reconsideration in light of Mulloy v. United States, 398 U. S. 410.