Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry A. Dodin et al., Appellants, v. Clara B. Dodin, Respondent, Impleaded with Another, 1908 — 191 N.Y. 530 · caselaw · US
General
Henry A. Dodin et al., Appellants, v. Clara B. Dodin, Respondent, Impleaded with Another
191 N.Y. 530·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry A. Dodin et al., Appellants, v. Clara B. Dodin, Respondent, Impleaded with Another.
Dodin v. Dodin, 116 App. Div. 327, affirmed.
(Submitted February 21, 1908;
decided March 10, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 14, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to set aside a conveyance of real property as fraudulent.
Jacob Fromme and W. Stebbins Smith for appellants.
Frederic R. Coudert and Lorenzo Semple for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Cli, J., G-kay, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscocic, JJ.