General
Diane Kuzyns, Respondent, v. City of New York et al., Defendants, Melohn Properties, Respondent, and York Scaffold Equipment Corp., Appellant
183 A.D.2d 579·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1992·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Diane Kuzyns, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Defendants, Melohn Properties, Respondent, and York Scaffold Equipment Corp., Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered on or about November 1, 1991, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Schoenfeld, J. No opinion. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Kupferman, Ross, Asch and Rubin, JJ.