Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lavender, Administrator, v. Kurn et al., Trustees, et al., 1946 — 329 U.S. 762 · caselaw · US
General
Lavender, Administrator, v. Kurn et al., Trustees, et al.
329 U.S. 762·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Murphy are of the opinion that the petition should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 427.
Lavender, Administrator, v. Kurn et al., Trustees, et al.
October 21, 1946.
N. Murry Edwards, James A. Waech-ter and Douglas H. Jones for petitioner. Maurice G. Roberts, Cornelius H. Skinker, Jr., William R. Gentry, Charles A. Helsell and John W. Freels for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied for want of a final judgment.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Murphy are of the opinion that the petition should be granted.