Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary Wiley, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant, 1895 — 144 N.Y. 717 · caselaw · US
General
Mary Wiley, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant
144 N.Y. 717·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Wiley, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued January 24, 1895;
decided February 8, 1895.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made February 12, 1894, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon an order dismissing the complaint on trial at Circuit and ordered a new trial.
William G. Beecher for appellant.
Isaac H. Mapna/rd for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm and judgment absolute ordered against plaintiff; no opinion.
All concur, except Gray and Bartlett, JJ., dissenting.
Order affirmed and judgment-accordingly.