Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joseph Fennelly, Respondent, v. The United Copper Company et al., Appellants, 1906 — 184 N.Y. 578 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joseph Fennelly, Respondent, v. The United Copper Company et al., Appellants
184 N.Y. 578·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joseph Fennelly, Respondent, v. The United Copper Company et al., Appellants.
People ex rel. Fennelly v. United Copper Co., 110 App. Div. 892, affirmed.
(Submitted March 2, 1906;
decided March 20, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 19; 1906, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendants to permit an inspection of the company’s stock book.
Dean Emery and Frederic 11. Kellogg for appellants.
Edward J. McGuire for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Not sitting; Hiscock, J.