Contracts · MBE-tested
AETNA INSURANCE CO. v. MENENDEZ
376 U.S. 781·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
AETNA INSURANCE CO. v. MENENDEZ.
No. 68.
Decided April 6, 1964.
William, A. Gillen for petitioner.
John P. Corcoran, Jr. for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, ante, p. 398.