Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frazier v. United States, 335 U. S. 497, 1949 — 336 U.S. 912 · caselaw · US
General
Frazier v. United States, 335 U. S. 497
336 U.S. 912·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Miscellaneous Orders.
No. 44.
Frazier v. United States, 335 U. S. 497.
[MAJORITY]
It is ordered that the first sentence of the last paragraph on page 7 of the slip opinion [335 U. S. at 505, lines 8-13], which begins “Given ten arbitrary choices among twenty-two prospective jurors . . . ,” be, and it is hereby, amended to read as follows:
“Given ten arbitrary choices among twenty-two prospective jurors not disqualified for cause, of whom thirteen were Government employees and nine privately engaged, he knowingly, of his own right, rejected nine of the latter and with knowledge or the full opportunity to secure it accepted without challenge all but one of the former.”
[The opinion was reported as amended in the bound volume of 335 U. S.]