Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Siebrand H. Niewenhous, Respondent, v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company et al., Appellants, 1905 — 183 N.Y. 538 · caselaw · US
General
Siebrand H. Niewenhous, Respondent, v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company et al., Appellants
183 N.Y. 538·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Siebrand H. Niewenhous, Respondent, v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company et al., Appellants.
(Submitted November 20, 1905;
decided November 28, 1905.)
[MAJORITY]
Motion for realignment denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 177 N. Y. 566.)