General

Iroquois Rubber Company, Respondent, v. Arthur E. J. Male and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Erik Heyl, Appellant

178 A.D. 910·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1917·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Iroquois Rubber Company, Respondent, v. Arthur E. J. Male and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Erik Heyl, Appellant. [MAJORITY] Judgment and order of the Special Term of the City Court of Buffalo reversed, and a new trial granted in the City Court, with costs in all courts to the appellant to abide the event. New trial to be had on the 18th day of April, 1917, at ten a. m. Held, that the condition limiting the right of the plaintiff to give testimony was error. All concurred.