Contracts · MBE-tested

JACKSON et al. v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF FLORIDA et al.

397 U.S. 589·Supreme Court of the United States·1970

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, and Mr. Justice Stewart dissent.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

JACKSON et al. v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF FLORIDA et al. No. 471, Misc. Decided April 20, 1970 Howard, W. Dixon for appellants. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, T. T. Turnbull and Michael Schwartz, Assistant Attorneys General, and S. Strome Maxwell for appellees. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for reconsideration in light of Goldberg v. Kelly, ante, p. 254; Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 23; and to determine whether the case is moot. The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, and Mr. Justice Stewart dissent.