General
METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO. v. DAVIS
112 F. 633·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1901
Before WALLACE~, Circuit Judge, and TOWNSEND, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO. v. DAVIS.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 13, 1901.)
No. 66.
Ai’peau—-Review—Discbbtionaky Rulings.
Tlie action of a trial court in denying a motion to open a default is not subject to review unless an abuse of discretion is clearly shown.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern-District of New York.
On Application to Review Order Denying Motion to Open Default.
Theodore H. Lark, for plaintiff in error.
Geo. C. l3odine, for defendant in error.
Before WALLACE~, Circuit Judge, and TOWNSEND, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed in open court on authority of Means v. Bank, 146 U. S. 620, 13 Sup. Ct. 186, 36 L. Ed. 1107; Isaacs v. U. S., 159 U. S. 487, 16 Sup. Ct. 51, 40 L. Ed. 229; Goldsby v. U. S., 160 U. S. 70, 16 Sup. Ct. 216, 40 L. Ed. 343.