General
Ernest St. George Lough et al., Survivors, etc., Appellants, v. A. Emilius Outerbridge et al., Respondents
145 N.Y. 601·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ernest St. George Lough et al., Survivors, etc., Appellants, v. A. Emilius Outerbridge et al., Respondents.
(Argued June 20, 1894
; decided October 9, 1894;
re-argument ordered;
re-argued February 7, 1895;
decided February 26, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made April 14, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
This case is reported on former argument, 143 N. Y. 271; on re-argument, 144 id. 642.
Treadwell Clevelcmd for appellants.
Wilhelmus Mynderse for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion by O’Brien, J., on original argument (143 N. Y. 271).
All concur, except Andrews, Ch. J., and Peckham, J., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.