General
Tampa Phosphate Railroad Co. v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co.
397 U.S. 910·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 877.
Tampa Phosphate Railroad Co. v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co.
James B. McDonough, Jr., for petitioner. William A. Gillen and James E. Thompson for respondent. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Gin-nane, and Jerome Nelson filed a memorandum in opposition for the United States et al. as amici curiae.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.