Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bridget Reilly, Respondent, v. Erie Railroad Company, Appellant, 1904 — 177 N.Y. 547 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Bridget Reilly, Respondent, v. Erie Railroad Company, Appellant
177 N.Y. 547·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bridget Reilly, Respondent, v. Erie Railroad Company, Appellant.
Reilly v. JEh'ie Railroad Go., 72 App. Div. 476, affirmed.
(Argued December 14, 1903;
decided January 5, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered August 8, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Henry Bacon and Joseph Merritt for appellant.
Cornelius J. Earley for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J.; Gray, Bartlett, Martin and Werner, JJ. Absent: Haight, J. Not sitting: Vann, J.