Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re Disbarment of Dolnick, 1964 — 377 U.S. 975 · caselaw · US
General
In re Disbarment of Dolnick
377 U.S. 975·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1314,
Misc.
In re Disbarment of Dolnick.
[MAJORITY]
It having been reported to the Court that Stanley Dol-nick, of Philadelphia, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, has been disbarred from the practice of the law by the judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, duly entered on the 4th day of April, 1964, and this Court by order of April 20, 1964, having suspended the said Stanley Dolnick from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent, and that the time within which to file a return to the rule has expired;
It is ordered that the said Stanley Dolnick be, and he is hereby, disbarred and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.