Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES v. GUANA-SANCHEZ, 1975 — 420 U.S. 513 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
UNITED STATES v. GUANA-SANCHEZ
420 U.S. 51343 L. Ed. 2d 361·Supreme Court of the United States·1975
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. GUANA-SANCHEZ
No. 73-820.
Argued January 14, 1975
Decided March 3, 1975
Paul L. Friedman argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Bork, Assistant Attorney General Petersen, and Gerald P. Norton.
Joseph Beeler, by appointment of the Court, 419 U. S. 961, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Donald J. Martin.
Sanford Jay Rosen and Melvin L. Wulf filed a brief for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.