Administrative
In the Matter of the Claim of John Dalberth, Respondent, against Iuppa & Battle Company and Another, Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent
237 A.D. 861·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1932·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of John Dalberth, Respondent, against Iuppa & Battle Company and Another, Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
Affd., 262 N. Y.
[MAJORITY]
— Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board, the constitutional question presented having been considered and passed upon. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Hill and Rhodes, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents on the ground that the question of the amount of claimant’s compensation should be based upon his capacity to earn and not upon his actual wages, and that section 15, subdivision 5-a, of Workmen’s Compensation Law, in so far as it limits the Board’s authority, is unconstitutional.