Contracts · MBE-tested
Universal Interpretive Shuttle Corp. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission et al.
390 U.S. 943·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 978.
Universal Interpretive Shuttle Corp. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission et al.
Jeffrey L. Nagin and Allen E. Susman for petitioner. Russell W. Cunningham, for respondent Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, and Manuel J. Davis for respondent D. C. Transit System, Inc. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.