Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gober et al. v. City of Birmingham, 1962 — 370 U.S. 934 · caselaw · US
General
Gober et al. v. City of Birmingham
370 U.S. 934·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 694.
Gober et al. v. City of Birmingham.
Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Arthur D. Shores, Peter A. Hall, Orzell Billingsley, Jr., Oscar W. Adams, Jr., James M. Nabrit III and Louis H. Poliak for petitioners. Earl McBee for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Court of Appeals of Alabama. Certiorari granted.