Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George R. LINKINS, Appellant, v. John G. SARGENT, Attorney General of the United States, Charles D. Joyce, Frank T. Beckert, et al., Appellees; George R. LINKINS, Appellant, v. John G. SARGENT, Attorney General of the United States, Louis F. Brill, Clinton C. Hunter, et al., Appellees, 1927 — 19 F.2d 683 · caselaw · US
General
George R. LINKINS, Appellant, v. John G. SARGENT, Attorney General of the United States, Charles D. Joyce, Frank T. Beckert, et al., Appellees; George R. LINKINS, Appellant, v. John G. SARGENT, Attorney General of the United States, Louis F. Brill, Clinton C. Hunter, et al., Appellees
19 F.2d 683·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George R. LINKINS, Appellant, v. John G. SARGENT, Attorney General of the United States, Charles D. Joyce, Frank T. Beckert, et al., Appellees. George R. LINKINS, Appellant, v. John G. SARGENT, Attorney General of the United States, Louis F. Brill, Clinton C. Hunter, et al., Appellees.
Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted January 4, 1927.
Decided May 2, 1927.
Nos. 4450, 4451.
R. A. Ford and G. R. Linkins, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
A. C. Wells, of Washington, D. C., for appellees.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice,, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — MARTIN, Chief Justice.]
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
These appeals present the same issues as those in William O. Gilbert, Appellant, v. John G. Sargent, Attorney General of the United States, et al. (Suit No. 4449) -App. D. C.-, 19 F.(2d) 681, the decision in which is handed down concurrently herewith. The cases accordingly were submitted together, and consistently with our conclusions in the former case the decrees of the lower court in the latter cases, to wit, No. 4450 and No. 4451, are reversed, with costs, and the several causes are remanded, for further proceedings not inconsistent with our decision in No. 4449.